Wikipedia:WikiProject Netherlands/Assessment
Netherlands pages by quality | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | |||||||
Total | |||||||
FA | 54 | ||||||
FL | 14 | ||||||
A | 1 | ||||||
GA | 170 | ||||||
B | 834 | ||||||
C | 2,972 | ||||||
Start | 11,894 | ||||||
Stub | 17,118 | ||||||
List | 871 | ||||||
Category | 14,552 | ||||||
Disambig | 55 | ||||||
File | 259 | ||||||
Portal | 9 | ||||||
Project | 27 | ||||||
Redirect | 738 | ||||||
Template | 1,108 | ||||||
Assessed | 50,676 | ||||||
Unassessed | 92 | ||||||
Total | 50,768 | ||||||
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 176,909 | Ω = 5.35 |
Welcome to the assessment department of the Netherlands WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Netherlands related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Netherlands}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Netherlands articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions[edit]
- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Netherlands WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article. It is however considered ethical conduct not to assess articles in the writing of which you yourself has been an important editor
- Can I rank an article as I like?
- No. Every editor can award stub, start, C, and B class. However, the higher quality labels require more. Good Article and Featured Article status can only be awarded to articles that have gone through the official Wikipedia nomination procedures. A-class assessment are reserved for very good articles, and should have received and fairly addressed extensive peer review (from within or outside the project).
- Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it; if it has indeed been improved; or the rating was unfair, a better quality will be assigned. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- I agreed with the low rating, but I have now improved the article, how can I get my rating up?
- Again, you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions[edit]
Quality assessments[edit]
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Netherlands}} project banner on its talk page: {{WikiProject Netherlands|class=???}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Netherlands articles) | FA | |
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Netherlands articles) | A | |
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Netherlands articles) | GA | |
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Netherlands articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Netherlands articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Netherlands articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Netherlands articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Netherlands articles) | FL | |
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Netherlands articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.
Quality scale[edit]
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
Requesting an assessment[edit]
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, you can request an assessment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Netherlands.
Assessment log[edit]
Netherlands articles: Index · Statistics · Log |
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
May 23, 2024[edit]
Renamed[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Dreamflight (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Daughter of Rage (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Dutch artists by province (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Dutch expatriate volleyball players in France (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- January 2024 Sint Maarten general election (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Judith de Leeuw (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- July 2024 Sint Maarten general election (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Koepoort (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Saskia Bollerman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
Removed[edit]
May 22, 2024[edit]
Renamed[edit]
Assessed[edit]
- 2010–11 FC Volendam season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2013–14 Go Ahead Eagles season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2013–14 MVV Maastricht season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Jaap Wolterbeek (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Jason van Duiven (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- List of battles involving Frisia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t)
- Nick Holten (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
Removed[edit]
- Category:Film controversies in the Netherlands (talk) removed.
- Nico van Straten (talk) removed.
May 21, 2024[edit]
Assessed[edit]
- 2024 Libéma Open (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Felix van Sambix (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Marrit Steenbergen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Oscar Hammerstein (lawyer) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Berg en Dal (municipality) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Rik de Lange (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Virgil Spier (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Yannick Leliendal (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
May 20, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- 2024 Netherlands Tri-Nation Series (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Disambig-Class. (rev · t)
- André Aptroot (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- De Bazel (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- De Graeff (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- De Grebber (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- De Huet (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- De Kring (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Shell WindEnergy (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- 2024 Netherlands T20I Tri-Nation Series (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Bernt Pessart (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t)
- Damienus Reverson (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Djenahro Nunumete (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Ton van der Laaken (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
May 19, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Caves of Maastricht (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Dutch Cropper (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Nieuwe Kerk (Haarlem) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Gerard Luttikhuizen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Marijn Ververs (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Mark Spenkelink (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Mascha Pijnenborg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Mexx Meerdink (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Oling, Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Shell Grotto, Nienoord (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Strongest Man of the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
May 18, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- 103rd ISTAR Battalion (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 48th World Science Fiction Convention (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Jill Baijings (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- 2023–24 Derde Divisie (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Caves of Maastricht (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Fantasticos (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Fatal Flowers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Netherlands-Pakistan field hockey record (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Netherlands Competition Authority (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Netherlands Design Institute (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Netherlands Space Office (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Netherlands v Essent NV (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Netherlands–American Amity Trust (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Roda '46 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Wandering Heart (film) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
May 17, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Geert Wilders (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Mandy van den Berg (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Siege of Hulst (1640) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- 1997–98 AFC Ajax season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2024 Radboud University Nijmegen pro-Palestinian campus occupation (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Deaths from kidney failure in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Exposome-NL (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Pia Dijkstra (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Piranha court case (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Teleport (Amsterdam) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Twan Scheepers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
May 16, 2024[edit]
Renamed[edit]
- Friesland (province) renamed to Friesland.
- List of overseas trips made by Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands renamed to List of official overseas trips made by Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands.
Reassessed[edit]
- Gerrit bij de Leij (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Category:Deputy prime ministers of the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Erik Huggers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Euromasters (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Europoortkering (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- ExitMundi.nl (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Friesland (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
- List of official overseas trips made by Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t)
- Mixed youth choir Leiden orphanage (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Roy Terschegget (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)