User talk:VincentHou528

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks for your contributions to Iraq at the 2024 Summer Olympics. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 15:16, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to 2024 Summer Olympics did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Bahooka (talk) 01:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Africa at the 2024 Summer Olympics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benjamin Richardson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australia at the 2024 Summer Olympics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Josh Katz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Judo qualification[edit]

The judo qualifiers are not over yet, please note the end of qualification period is 23th June, and the publications of the final ranking is 25th June. I'm too tired to delete all your edits. I know you're enthusiastic, but at least see the timeline first. No need for explanation to defend your edit, the point is that before June 27th, there was no judo section in the articles nations at the 2024 Summer Olympics. Amnom Darius (talk) 07:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can't you see this? You ignored my message and continued to edit it Amnom Darius (talk) 11:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Amnom Darius: Please, Stop deleting judo sections.
You are correct that the judo qualification window will conclude on 23 June 2024, but most qualified athletes are already determined. In only 3 weight categories can a judoka lose their direct qualification, and in all cases they will get a continental quota. Changes in qualification status could occur only in a small number of current continental or returned quotas holders. Please, let the sections and lists be. CLalgo (talk) 11:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, I appreciate your argument, but it cannot be justified, in ranking qualifications, too many things can happen, especially lots change, for instance in Badminton, there are so many athletes removed from the ranking even the position are different from the normal calculation that people expected. Secondly, because the ranking list has not been officially published by World Judo, so all the reasons or whatever to defend this section, should be categorize as "predictive" and do not match the facts. What's wrong with waiting until the ranking officially published? Amnom Darius (talk) 11:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As long as the rankings have not been published, even though there is no championships or event being held, this means that the qualifications are still ongoing, because it has not been completed by world judo. Amnom Darius (talk) 11:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Amnom Darius: Firstly, the rankings ARE public. You can see them here and in 120 cross section references at Judo at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Qualification. Secondly, judo isn't badminton. The qualified athletes can't change significantly, as I've previously explained. CLalgo (talk) 12:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, the question is whether the ranking has been finalized on the website? Have you see that in the website? You misunderstood my illustration, I said it could be the same as badminton, I didn't say judo is badminton Amnom Darius (talk) 12:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My meaning was that judo isn't like badminton. about 99% of qualifiers are already set. 100% of those currently marked as qualifying through the "IJF World Ranking List" have secured their qualification. Your insistence on the matter is puzzling. CLalgo (talk) 08:12, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Based on your explanation and your interpretation, 99% of the qualifiers has been set up, which is directly proven why we cannot simply assume that it's going to qualified, therefore it means that the qualification is not finished. I know your enthusiasm for qualifications like this, but please, follow the existing timeline for ranking qualifications, what's the problem with being patient until the real rankings are actually published? I don't need your explanation anymore, whatever happens, until the specified date, whatever you do, adding the judo sections, I don't care, but before that, especially if it is only confirmed from the NOC and there are no further confirmation from the IJF as the ranking classification holder, everything is considered assumptions Amnom Darius (talk) 08:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I know your enthusiasm for erasing other editors' work, but please read the 3rd sentence of my 2 line comment: 100% of those currently marked as qualifying through the "IJF World Ranking List" have secured their qualification.. But, you have removed that information as well, as you've conveniently forgot to quote that sentence. CLalgo (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1. What's wrong with waiting for the ranking to be finished? or even you give me the sources of final rankings, 'You're just providing the official website rankings, however there's no explanations in the website stating that "This is the final list of the judo qualification rankings", you didn't even explain me why is it matter to edit th3 sections right now. I've been waiting for this for days, but all your premises are just based on "oh this is different from badminton", "no this is 100%", or whatever the reason is. Even though I only have one premise, namely waiting for confirmation from the IJF, this answers all existing concerns, and is stated in accordance with the judo guidelines. The question for you is, do you understand all this, do the judo guidelines explain that in the current period, June 1st or before, at least there's bla bla athletes have passed the qualifications? You could say all the tournaments are over, but the Judo qualifying guides at the 2024 Summer Olympics, is there a definite elaboration that you can relate to, at least with a qualifying timeline that could make me stop deleting all the judo guides?. If you talks about your 2nd line sentences, or whatever it is, i am not blind, even you stated that "currently", this simply means that we cannot trust your explanations, as it is means "temporarily", and open up the inclinations of "another possibilities might happened".
2. Why can't you be patient until the official publication date of the ranking? Until that date, if both of you, whether this users or even you who want to edit the judo section, or you are going to make me unable to edit the judo section, I won't mind, I won't even bother with all of this business.
3. Wikipedia is not a platform for you and I sat down to discuss it just to explain why this NOC or athlete is 100% qualified, has got a quota through this ranking, especially before the specified date, it's all predictive, and the reason behind it is simple, it hasn't reached the date yet. Even if your calculations are accurate, too many things can happen, even if you say "oh this only happens in badminton", and you can come up with thousands of justifications, the same logic can still happen since too many things can change, before finalization, the sport can still changeable, this can also be assumed (if I want to counter your reasons that say this is 100% quali At least I will admit this if you can really prove that you are involved in an official judo governing team, or an official source from the International Judo Federation, therefore, there will be no adding judo sections (except if the final ranking already being released) and this is the end of my explanation, no matter what you want. No matter how long you will reply, I won't reply. Thank you very much Amnom Darius (talk) 11:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]