User talk:Tonkarooson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Tonkarooson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 04:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Btspurplegalaxy again. Sorry to bother you again but I have a question that I'm both curious and confused about. On the article All Eyes on Me (Jisoo song), I had added "K-pop" to the genres under the Quick Facts box, but it got removed 2 times by two different people; you can find these edits at the top of the revision history, as it's still new changes as if typing this. Is there a more specific response for this? Tonkarooson (talk) 01:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The only reason why it was removed was because K-Pop isn't a music genre. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 13:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think K-Pop is a genre; there are other things that make sense that say it isn't a genre. What makes it not a music genre to Wikipedia? Tonkarooson (talk) 10:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! Tonkarooson, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 02:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Special interest (Autism) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Special interest (autism). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because It needs to be written in encyclopedic language (see WP:EPSTYLE) and the claims made should be sourced to reliable sources (see WP:RS, WP:REFB). I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for doing that for me. I do have one question. Is LinkedIn a reliable source? Tonkarooson (talk) 03:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is rarely, if ever, a reliable source. In this case, it was not. Worse, it was spam for a paid service. — Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, most of the content had to be removed. See the history page for why[1]. I have notified the main article at Talk:Autism spectrum#Draft:Special interest (autism). — Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh jeez, I didn't know it was like spam! Thank you for letting me know. I am comfortable to the article to be removed, I have another way to see my original text. Is there a way you could give me a small-medium sized list of reliable sources?? Tonkarooson (talk) 03:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Generally, refer to WP:RSP. Medical claims require even better sources per WP:MEDRS, so you may want to not make medical claims at all, if you can help it, before you gain more experience with identifying reliable sources. Best, — Usedtobecool ☎️ 04:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is enough on this topic to justify a separate article. Perhaps a concise description can be added to the Other features section of the Autism article - as long as you can include a reference or references that describe what you mean by Special interest. David notMD (talk) 10:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you agree, you can request that the draft be deleted by putting Db-author at the top, inside double curly brackets {{ }}. Otherwise, if no changes made, in five months you will get a talk message that the draft will be deleted at six months. David notMD (talk) 10:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you are saying I should have a sub heading on the original Article, I think it will too big seeing how much I want to add on that topic. What does "other features" supposed to mean exactly? (No hate, I like clarification). Tonkarooson (talk) 20:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Tonkarooson (talk) 20:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At least I have time to improve it. This is a lot of helpful info and advice, thank you all of it Guys
I hope I can get lots better and I could get Remembered.
Again, thanks for all the help from everyone on any type of talk page possible 🫰🏼 :D take care now! Tonkarooson (talk) 20:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photos[edit]

At a simple level, you can take a photograph, add it to Wikipedia Commons, then add it to an article. Even that can get tricky. I took a photograph of a work of art. Because the art was copyright protected, my photo was rejected at Commons. Going forward, I hope you find rewarding ways to contribute to Wikipedia. A recommended path is to start with efforts to improve existing articles before another attempt at creating an article. David notMD (talk) 10:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that I should start with something smaller, but I am still going to try to make my original article better with better sources and better vocabulary. I also appreciate all the help I'm getting from so many different people! Thank you everyone, it is so helpful! :D Tonkarooson (talk) 20:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 05:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I have seen that you have removed K-pop on my edits and I believe that K-Pop is a genre, I think there are good reasons to back this up that may show that K-Pop is a Genre. If there is a policy/guideline that does not label K-Pop as a musical genre, I would like to know this guideline. Thank you. Tonkarooson (talk) 22:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]