User talk:Rayanmou07

January 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Galobtter. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Capital punishment in the United Arab Emirates, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Galobtter (talk) 03:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check the new Federal Penal code of 2020. Article 409 says that homosexuality carries 6 months imprisonment. Rayanmou07 (talk) 17:43, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Capital punishment in the United Arab Emirates, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 17:30, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check the new Federal Penal Code of 2020. Article 409 says that homosexuality carries 6 months imprisonment. Rayanmou07 (talk) 17:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 17:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Rayanmou07 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m sorry for everything I have done. I have abused multiple accounts and I have tried to get others blocked. I would like to change my behavior and start citing reliable sources and playing by the rules. I’m sorry that I blamed others. I’m sorry for being rude and immature. Please forgive me. Rayanmou07 (talk) 09:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I’m sorry for everything I have done. I have abused multiple accounts and I have tried to get others blocked. I would like to change my behavior and start citing reliable sources and playing by the rules. I’m sorry that I blamed others. I’m sorry for being rude and immature. Please forgive me. [[User:Rayanmou07|Rayanmou07]] ([[User talk:Rayanmou07#top|talk]]) 09:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I’m sorry for everything I have done. I have abused multiple accounts and I have tried to get others blocked. I would like to change my behavior and start citing reliable sources and playing by the rules. I’m sorry that I blamed others. I’m sorry for being rude and immature. Please forgive me. [[User:Rayanmou07|Rayanmou07]] ([[User talk:Rayanmou07#top|talk]]) 09:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I’m sorry for everything I have done. I have abused multiple accounts and I have tried to get others blocked. I would like to change my behavior and start citing reliable sources and playing by the rules. I’m sorry that I blamed others. I’m sorry for being rude and immature. Please forgive me. [[User:Rayanmou07|Rayanmou07]] ([[User talk:Rayanmou07#top|talk]]) 09:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Rayanmou07 (talk) 09:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rayanmou07 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn’t providing false information. I was just updating the article to match the current Penal Code. This was a false block.Rayanmou07 (talk) 17:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your comments here and below conclusively demonstrate you need to remain blocked at this time. Yamla (talk) 20:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your edits were incompetent, inserting content with a source as if that source applied to the whole list, but worse, you were editing without being logged in to gain an advantage--and then you tried to get others blocked. That's a no no. Next time, start by citing reliable sources, citing them properly (not bare URLs), and playing by the rules. Drmies (talk) 17:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you don’t understand. The new Federal Penal Code from 2020 agrees with my edits. What I would do now is source my edits with information from trusted sources. Why did you block me for no reason? -- Rayanmou07 (talk)

You weren't blocked for posting false information. You were blocked for edit warring and abusively editing while logged out. --AntiDionysius (talk) 18:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it’s the other (anonymous) user’s fault, not mine. Blame the kid. Don’t blame me or the human rights organizations, blame the odd kid. Rayanmou07 (talk) 18:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]