User talk:Micsterm

This is Micsterm's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Claude Stermann (February 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Claude Stermann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Claude Stermann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:36, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Micsterm! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:36, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ophelie Stermann (February 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ophelie Stermann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ophelie Stermann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Claude Stermann[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Claude Stermann, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 09:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ophelie Stermann (April 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ophelie Stermann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ophelie Stermann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Micsterm. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Catherine Stermann, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:01, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Catherine Stermann[edit]

The article Catherine Stermann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability does not appear to have been shown since tagging in 2018. Internet search does not show notable references to demonstrate notability. Page was created and then edited by family relation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KeepItGoingForward (talk) 00:07, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @KeepItGoingForward

I'd be very sorry but I have no stronger arguments to oppose.

Best regards from Paris, France,

Michel Stermann (talk) 00:25, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there perhaps any sources I may have missed or other references that can be added to the page to show her notability? KeepItGoingForward (talk) 00:28, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@KeepItGoingForward very kind of you but my current health status does not enable further research from my side. Cancer w/ chemotherapy, Covid-19, plus Influenza is a little too much for one man over 70.

Rgds, Michel Stermann (talk) 00:38, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to hear that and I hope that your health improves. I will try to do another search to see if I can find some other references in regards to Catherine's notability. KeepItGoingForward (talk) 00:51, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@KeepItGoingForward That's really kind of you. Don't forget she may also appear as

Claude Stermann

Ophélie Stermann

Catherine Melo

Warm thanks for your help and compassion! Michel Stermann (talk) 03:26, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Michel, I think at the moment the proposed deletion is not appropriate as you cannot respond properly due to your health situation, so I removed it. For emphasize to any editor wanting to improve the page I added the notes about Catherine appearing with the other names to the Talk:Catherine_Stermann page even though you do mention it in the article. Bien amicalement à vous. KeepItGoingForward (talk) 04:34, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@KeepItGoingForward Thank you so much for your very human attitude and understanding. I do indeed appreciate. Toutes mes amitiés.

Michel Stermann (talk) 05:23, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]