User talk:Həlimə

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Həlimə, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 01:14, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Armenia's territorial claims against Azerbaijan[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Armenia's territorial claims against Azerbaijan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:54, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

‎Aghatgaya[edit]

I am afraid I have deleted the article. I note that:

The article consists of a copied entry from "Explanatory dictionary of Azerbaijani places' names in Armenia" [1];
The dictionary itself is clearly a partisan source;
You previously created the article Armenia's territorial claims against Azerbaijan consisting of text copied from the same source (now speedily deleted as promotional);
The article was misleading - the mountain is in Armenia, but the article made it seem as if it was in Azerbaijan;
There are no relevant Google hits for either "Aghatgaya" or "Akatkar" (the names cannot be found at Google Maps).

Mike Rosoft (talk) 11:00, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aghahamzali[edit]

Please stop adding entries copied from "Explanatory dictionary of Azerbaijani places' names in Armenia" to Wikipedia. First, doing this constitutes copyright violation. Second, the dictionary is a partisan source, so it would be preferred to use a different source for the history of the village; see the policy of neutrality. Third, there are no other Google hits for the name "Aghahamzali". (In any case, if Wikipedia were to have an article about the village, it would use its common name - Marmarshen.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:10, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is possible that the dictionary has a typo for both the Armenian and the Azerbaijani name of the village/town. Wikipedia already has an article Marmarashen, which lists the other name as "Aghamzali". - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:19, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Turns out, almost all Google hits for "Aghamzali" have been copied from Wikipedia. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:38, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have deleted the rest of your articles which you have copied from the same source. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:30, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Guneshli waterfall[edit]

The article Guneshli waterfall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 08:22, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Guneshli waterfall for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guneshli waterfall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guneshli waterfall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PamD 23:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Guneshli waterfall[edit]

Good dey ! Mister User:PamD. Sorry, we have no more information aboutthe Lerikrivers.--Həlimə (talk) 12:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shusha physical-geographical features[edit]

The article Shusha physical-geographical features has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and could be considered a fork of shusha province or any other article that generally talk about the geography of the area

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 12:16, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Imishli physical-geographical features[edit]

The article Imishli physical-geographical features has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced fork of another article that generally talk about the geography of the area

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 08:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tikebend waterfall (Azerbaijan)[edit]

The article Tikebend waterfall (Azerbaijan) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, doesn't meet GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 08:15, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mamirli waterfall (Azerbaijan)[edit]

The article Mamirli waterfall (Azerbaijan) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, doesn't meet GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 08:15, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sevda Mikayilova[edit]

The article Sevda Mikayilova has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, doesn't meet GNG or NBLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 08:21, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Qələbin Waterfall[edit]

The article Qələbin Waterfall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Source unverifiable, doesnt meet GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 10:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]