User talk:DietrichMayer

Homo floresiensis[edit]

Dietrich, if you are going to edit the article please try to understand that we need to have grammatical sentences. You tend to edit sections so that they no longer make grammatical sense. You have twice edited this paragraph to delete a reference and produce non-sentences. The first sentence is not a sentence. The second is actually several separate sentences connected by commas:

In 2005, a computer-generated model of the skull of Homo floresiensis. The scan had controversial results, the supporters of the new species claim said that it provided further support that the controversial specimens from Indonesia do indeed represent a new species, to the hobbit skeptics it showed signs of pathology. These results continued to be debated.

Some edits are very problematic. In this edit [1] you have changed the words of quotation. This is wholly unacceptable. Paul B 12:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken the liberty of moving your content to the User page to avoid getting comment mixed up with it. Paul B 12:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You know perfectly well where I am getting it from, because I footnoted every single point. Do you have any explanations for your assertions. You have simply deleted footnoted text. This is as disgraceful as rewriting quotations. Paul B 20:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]