User talk:DavidDurieux

Welcome!

Hello, DavidDurieux, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:32, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I removed the content from The Sandoz Incident is because it was copyrighted. It was copied from a BBC web page [1]. Users are allowed to remove content if it’s copyrighted. Seano1 23:57, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Age of Empires: The Age of Kings[edit]

I'm guessing you didn't read the edit history or page closely and mistook the DS version for the PC version. They are substantially different in gameplay and there is no reason to delete the DS version article. Some guy 18:37, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism[edit]

Please make sure you warn editors appropriately (using the templates at Template:TestTemplates) before reporting them at WP:AIV. For example, you reported 24.86.103.169 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), a user that had vandalized once this year and not been given a warning. Please use the admin intervention page only for vandals whose vandalism is either really serious (massive blanking on many pages, vandalism of commonly used templates) or vandals that continue after a final warning. Thank you, and happy vandal-fighting! Kusma (討論) 03:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I understand that, it does look as if no further warning is necessary. However, the last warning was from December, and so it might be a completely different user using the IP now. (The old vandal also used to edit different pages, so it probably is a different user). If the "final warning" is more than a day old and the user hasn't been blocked before, I generally prefer to give another warning before blocking. Repeat offenders that return from a block and immediately start vandalizing again should just be blocked, though. (Sorry if this is incoherent, I am a new admin and still trying to figure out my thoughts on how best to deal with vandals). Kusma (討論) 03:24, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Point of View[edit]

Hello. I saw your post in my user page. I don´t think "torture camp" is an idequate or non-neutral definition of Guantanamo Bay detainment Camp. It may be not be political correct or convinient to affirm it but information gathered about this prision states that is against Human Rights and the procedures on detainees are included in the definition of torture and that is a fact, not a mere point of view or personal opinion. Thank you.Fpenteado