User talk:CFuller

Welcome!

Hello, CFuller, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Robdurbar 18:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Clancy[edit]

I'd be interested to know from where you dug up his date of birth. I've been unable to locate it for ages, and your source might be of some use. - Dudesleeper · Talk 17:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, never mind - I see Blackpool's official website now lists it. - Dudesleeper · Talk 17:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal of WikiProject:Darts[edit]

I have proposed a new WikiProject, named WikiProject:Darts. If you think the idea was good, you can support this proposal there. Armbrust (talk) 01:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Darts[edit]

Hi, I would like to say that I also am very involved in darts and created alot of pages and templates, I fixed alot of things on darts recently and made a couple of articles on tournaments, find the links on my page and take a look, thanks for the work you are doing aswell. Mr.Kennedy1 (talk) 10:34, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Darts[edit]

I have created this WikiProject an need all the help possible. PLEASE SIGN UP AND HELP OUT Mr.Kennedy1 (talk) 16:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for expanding the 2009 US Open Darts article, Nice work. It's great to see people are helping the Project. Remember, try and get more people to join. Mr.Kennedy1 (talk) 17:05, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note[edit]

Its great to have you doing so much edits to darts articles, just remember to put in references for all your edits, I recommend using the WP:refToolbar gadget, you don't have to download it and I have starting using it recently, just go into My prefences then Gadgets, hen just tick the RefTools box an save. It is a very good tool that is easy to use. Remember, feel free to ask me any questions if you are having problems with anything. Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk 10:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfinished discussion at WikiProject Darts[edit]

Hi, I invite you to finish the dispute for the importance ratings on darts articles.

Click here to see discussion.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Darts at 16:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

2010 World Grand Prix Darts lead[edit]

Discussion moved to Talk:2010 World Grand Prix Darts

Hi, I don't want to be edit-warring with you so we have to resolve this now. According to WP:LEAD the lead should summarize the main body of the article which is what my version does. Thanks. Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk 23:41, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, WP:LEAD should be a summary of the main article. Your version contains too much of the information that is already in the main body. Take a look at the leads for the 2009 and 2008 WGP articles. Yes, they do include the prize fund - fair enough - but they don't include the qualification criteria or TV coverage/sponsorship info, which your lead does. I hope you can see my point, because I can understand what you are saying, even if I don't necessarily agree with it. CFuller (talk) 08:10, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but they are wrongly written aswell, thats why I started WP:DARTS, so I could fix darts articles and make them into GAs and they will not get that far if you don't follow the criteria. Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk 10:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, take a look at the articles for the 2010 and 2009 PDC World Championships. Are they poorly written? I say not - the leads in those articles display the venue and dates, defending champions, tournament winners, but NOT the qualification criteria, sponsors, TV coverage etc (these come in the main body of the article). This is how I believe the WGP leads should be written, and this is my interpretation of WP:LEAD. CFuller (talk) 10:29, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the discussion to the talk page of the WGP for more points of view. Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk 14:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Already Over[edit]

The article Already Over has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NSONG criteria for separate article. Needs to be incorporated into the album's article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 16:49, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Already Over for deletion[edit]

The article Already Over is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Already Over until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. I42 (talk) 16:55, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Already Over[edit]

The article Already Over has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NSONG criteria for separate article. Needs to be incorporated into the album's article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 17:23, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the article can be improved, because it doesn't meet the required criteria. I agree that it should be deleted. CFuller (talk) 17:49, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Essex[edit]

Hello,
We noticed that you are from Essex. We are taking this opportunity to invite you to join WikiProject Essex. WikiProject Essex is a collaboration of users who are interested in improving the quality of all of the articles on Wikipedia about Essex. If you are interested, please feel free to add you name to our list of contributors.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Essex at 19:17, 6 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Use of the Ulster Banner[edit]

Just so you are aware for future articles that you may create: Northern Ireland does not have an official flag and hasn't had one since 1972. The use of the now defunct Ulster Banner is covered by the Irish manual of style which clearly states if the organisation uses no particular flag or banner, do not use any flag. The use of flags is also covered by the general manual of style. You may also be aware than any person born in Northern Ireland has the right to both British and Irish citizenship so unless you have a reliable source for their nationality none should be used. Hope this helps. Bjmullan (talk) 20:55, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unless YOU can find a proper consensus that the Ulster Banner SHOULD NOT be used for Northern Irish sportspeople, I will continue to revert your vandalism. Is that understood? CFuller (talk) 21:22, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you revert again against two MOS without taking part in ANY discussion I will report you to AN/I Bjmullan (talk) 21:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was involved in this debate a couple of weeks ago and I've been watching it since. I left the discussion when this outrageous statement about the Ulster Banner was made by User:O'Fenian: The context is completely inappropriate. The sectarian rag should not be used to represent Northern Ireland as a geographical location. Consensus has always been clear on this, despite claims that consensus is somehow needed. I noticed today that OFenian continues to look for examples of this flag to remove them, as does User:Bjmullan. In fact there is no consensus on this, and if you carefully read the Manual of Style it makes no statement on the matter of flags being used to represent people in the sporting events. It is sad that a number of editors seek to interfere in articles about which they probably know nothing, just to make a point. I am yet again going to revert Bjmullan's most recent edit and restore this darts article to the state preferred by those who know about darts, as against the state preferred by those who don't know about flags. CFuller, you might like to examine other darts (and otgher sports including snooker) articles and make good the bad work that has been done regarding the Ulster Banner. There is at least one other article that Bjmullan has edited. WizOfOz (talk) 22:54, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad I have your support on this, WizOfOz. CFuller (talk) 07:25, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 UK Open Darts[edit]

Hi, I see this article has been locked for editing, but for some unknown reason the locking editor also reverted to the version favoured by Bjmullan. The isuue of BLP is obviously not relevant when you look at what BLP is really about, but there you go. There appears to be no consensus for the removal of those flags, so when it comes off the block I think they should be re-instated. What do you think? WizOfOz (talk) 20:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree with that - they should be reinstated as soon as possible. As you say, there is no consensus for removing the flags. CFuller (talk) 22:36, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mervyn King GA Review[edit]

Hello CFuller, I am retiring from Wikipedia due to other commitments and cannot complete the GA process and was wondering if you could manage the Mervyn King GA review when it gets reviewed (if you want to or have time). It shouldn't be long it is 17 on this list WP:GAN#SPORT. If it requires much work by all means let it fail, however it would be a shame to waste the review and to my knowledge no darts biography on Wikipedia meet the GA standard so it would be a shame as I have put hours of work into it. If you cannot do it maybe another user in the Wikiproject could. Thanks (I have also left this on User:Wonderwizard talk page also). User:joesayers ^talk 00:42, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PDC[edit]

Well those 2 events and the Grand Prix might easily change 5 players or more. Plus the current situation is linked under external links and if allready qualified and current qualifiers are mixed it gets confusing. No current sport events (e.g. the UEFA CL) list possible qualifiers here. I'm up for discussion of course and have started one at the article's talk page. -Koppapa (talk) 12:53, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand some of your points. But I do feel that it's a bit strange to have just the international qualifiers listed when all bar 2, 3 or 4 players in the Order of Merit listings have also effectively secured their places. Also, what does the Grand Prix have to do with this, as that tournament finished last month? If you mean the Grand Slam, that's a non-ranking event. CFuller (talk) 14:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation: WikiProject Autism[edit]

Greetings! You are hereby invited to WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of autism, Asperger syndrome, and Autistic culture on Wikipedia. As the project emphasizes contribution from autistic editors, it is especially interested in you, who have chosen to list yourself as a Wikipedian with Asperger syndrome. Muffinator (talk) 22:42, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia ads	file info – #251

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, CFuller. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Thanawat Gaweenuntawong) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Thanawat Gaweenuntawong, CFuller!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 15:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, CFuller. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, CFuller. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2011 UK Open Qualifier 2 and other articles for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 UK Open Qualifier 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]