User talk:Bradelykooper

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Bradelykooper, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MrOllie (talk) 17:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Kadama (App)[edit]

Hello Bradelykooper, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Kadama (App), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kadama (App).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chris Troutman (talk) 22:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AFDs[edit]

Hello, Bradelykooper,

AFD deletion discussions are not an area that many brand new editors venture into (or even know about) and I see you have been active there lately. This is just an advisory that it takes a commitment to participate thoughtfully in deletion discussions, you have to make a careful evaluation of articles and how Wikipedia policy on notability applies to them and seriously assess the sources and maybe even look for additional sources yourself. Drive-by comments to Keep or Delete are not helpful as AFDs are not a vote but an active discussion among participants. I don't mean to discourage your participation just emphasize to you how essential it is to put effort and time into your evaluation of what should happen to articles on this project. We don't delete articles lightly so considered comments on the value of them is welcome.

If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia and its deletion processes, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Bradelykooper, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Hello Bradelykooper. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bradelykooper. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bradelykooper|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 11:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]