User talk:Bennett1203


Home (en · es)	Talk	To do	Interests	Research	Contributions

Add a request that I will read and happily oblige to!

Tap on the pretty kitty to message me!

However, beware of the Bennett1203 User Page Grim Reaper, who shall archive your message if Bennett1203 hasn’t replied to it.

This is Bennett1203's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 30 days

Speedy deletion nomination of CaseOh[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CaseOh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CaseOh. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bennett,

The only way I know to overcome an AFD Delete decision is to create a Draft version and submit it to WP:AFC for review. I looked at the previous version which was deleted and it was in much better shape than your version. You might consider going to WP:REFUND and asking for it to be restored to Draft space where you could work on it. But creating a new article and placing it in main space makes it likely that it will be tagged for CSD G4 speedy deletion.

If you have questions about this, please bring them to the Teahouse. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:16, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 27 § From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia until a consensus is reached. NotAGenious (talk) 17:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:3092:B81A:3507:5213 (talk) 18:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spacecraft retirement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batteries.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Granny (video game series) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Granny (video game series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Granny (video game series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 07:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Huygens Landing Site[edit]

Hello, Bennett1203. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Huygens Landing Site, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about TitanAir[edit]

Hello Bennett1203, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, TitanAir, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TitanAir.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Toadspike}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Toadspike (talk) 19:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Doors (Roblox game) (May 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheTechie was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Doors (Roblox game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 00:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Doors (Roblox game) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Doors (Roblox game). Thanks! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 02:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amazon Live for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amazon Live is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amazon Live until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Deauthorized. ^(talk) 12:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:CaseOh[edit]

The page Draft:CaseOh has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

BLP banned editor, CU/CIR blocked, claims of harassment, best to simply remove and someone else can start if they want, free from the baggage.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 02:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bennett1203 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I just logged onto my previous account, where it was blocked for advertising. I have since changed and want to be a Wikipedia contributor, however, as I logged onto my previous account, my IP address was blocked. The previous account was blocked from Wikipedia for advertising, however I have changed now, and have made 800+ edits, all garnering over 1 million+ views. If you could unblock my IP address and let me back to editing, I would coincide with Wikipedia rules. Additionally, that block was over a year ago. I would be happy if you oblige to my request. Wikipedia is my place where I calm down, and I would like to be unblocked. Sincerely, Bennett1203

Decline reason:

I'm blocking this account directly as a sock account; you need to request unblock from your original account. If you have a account, forget about your IP address. The block is on youn personally, not just your account, you should not edit under any account or IP until your original account is unblocked. 331dot (talk) 17:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2024[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Hello. I have read your message and you claim I’m a sock puppet account. The meaning is of someone creating another account after their previous account has been banned, and continuing to do mischievous and rule breaking edits to Wikipedia. I have not done anything related to that. My past account was for fun, and I was pretty new to Wikipedia, so I didn’t know much about it. Weirdly, when I logged in for a new account, I wasn’t IP banned. I didn’t intend to create this account to keep doing those edits, I created this account to help contribute to Wikipedia, not to plagiarize and mess up Wikipedia.}} below. 331dot (talk) 17:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bennett1203 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I have read the message of a moderator who has claimed my account as a sock puppet account. I am very sorry for the breaking of that rule, I didn’t know. My past account is Beenet324 for your information. I am very sorry for breaking that rule. Additionally, Wikipedia helps cope with my mental health, as not too long ago I wanted to unalive myself. However, Wikipedia helped me overcome this. I am very sorry for breaking this rule, and I would be greatly relieved if my account was unblocked. I do not want to go through those horrible episodes again. Sincerely, Bennett1203

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. This appeal is good, but please post only one appeal at a time, and at the bottom of the talk page, not at the top. I have moved these to the bottom. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Bennett1203 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I have read 331dot‘s message and his claim is that I am a sock puppet account. The meaning is of someone creating another account after their previous account has been banned, and continuing to do mischievous and rule breaking edits to Wikipedia. I have not done anything related to that. My past account was for fun, and I was pretty new to Wikipedia, so I didn’t know much about it. Weirdly, when I logged in for a new account, I wasn’t IP banned. I didn’t intend to create this account to keep doing those edits, I created this account to help contribute to Wikipedia, not to plagiarize and mess up Wikipedia.

Accept reason:

Congratulations. You are unblocked. I suggest reviewing the messages above on your talk page as a learning exercise, because you have generated a lot of content that has had to be removed, or moved to draft space. You seem to be working here in good faith now, so please continue working to improve. Contact me if you need any help, or post a message in WP:TEAHOUSE. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify: Do you wish to abandon your earlier account and continue working with this one? ~Anachronist (talk) 18:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Anachronist: Yes: I wish to abandoned my earlier account and continue editing with this account. I also want to give you a big thank you, as you are very empathetic to my conundrum right now. (talk) ~15:10, 19 May 2024 (EDT)

@MSGJ: Can you help me MSGJ. My account was blocked because I accidentally logged into an account where I advertised myself. A few months later, I created this account which somehow allowed me to edit. I think my blockage was over with. However, today, I accidentally logged into that account when logging into this one, and I didn’t know it would ban my IP. On my previous account (Beenet324), I was blocked for self-advertising. However, since I created this account, I have learned my lesson, and want to contribute to Wikipedia as much as I can. Also, you were the recommended person Wikipedia gave me to ask you questions, so I’m pinging you because I feel as you’re trustworthy and helpful. (talk) ~18:10, 19 May 2024 (EDT)

@Dennis Brown: I’m also tagging you too, check the message at the top of this. (talk) ~18:15, 19 May 2024 (EDT)

Can someone help me[edit]

@Materialscientist: @331dot: My block purpose was a complete accident and I didn’t want to get IP banned. I am a good contributor to Wikipedia: I have gotten 1 million+ views on the pages I’ve edited, been thanked by two people, in which they are admins, and have overall done a good job to this community. Also, I didn’t create this account to keep make falsified edits, I created this account because I wanted to genuinely help Wikipedia, not plagiarize and spread fake information around it. I have changed. And I promise to never sockpuppet again. If anyone could just give me one more chance I will happily oblige and make Wikipedia better again. God bless you and your family. Bennett1203 (talk) 23:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m losing hope. Bennett1203 (talk) 23:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't ping a bunch of different users while your unblock request is still awaiting review; it won't get your request reviewed any faster. Like every other Wikipedia user, administrators are volunteers who work when they have time. Your unblock request is one of several dozen in a queue, so you simply have to wait your turn. It may be days or even weeks before your request is evaluated. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 01:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I again urge you to seek assistance from a qualified professional that can help you with any immediate issues. 331dot (talk) 07:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you 331dot. However, for some reason I am feeling much better. Hope to get back to editing soon! Bennett1203 (talk) 18:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See your appeal box above. I have unblocked you. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Bless you and your family Anachronist. Bennett1203 (talk) 20:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Doors (Roblox game) (May 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CSMention269 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Doors (Roblox game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 11:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bennett1203! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 11:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joyride Sweets moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Joyride Sweets. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Alpha3031 (t • c) 16:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]