User talk:A1N2D3R4E5W6

A1N2D3R4E5W6 (talk) 00:00, 30 May 2020 (UTC) Note:If the next unblock request is declined, please EXTENDED CONFIRMED protect my page for a week or two. At 19:36 on May 31, I will be autoconfirmed, so semi protection will be insufficient past that point. Thank you. A1N2D3R4E5W6 (talk)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

ST47 (talk) 22:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A1N2D3R4E5W6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Who did I CU block against? If it was just between me and an IP editor, it should be allowed. Investigate please. Thanks. A1N2D3R4E5W6 (talk) 20:45, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please follow the steps outlined in WP:GAB to contest your block. Note that you need to follow the steps given in "Checkuser and Oversight blocks". Yamla (talk) 20:48, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A1N2D3R4E5W6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

NOTE: Please, only checkusers review this unblock request as it is a CU block. Anyway, I created this account upon mistake. I wanted to contribute to it with Wikinews, but I accidentally clicked on Wikipedia while logged in. I did not know I made a userpage on enwiki until it was too late. I decided to proceed with this IP, if that is the reason for the block(CU blocked aren’t always supper clear on the manner), then please unblock me. This will not happen again, I promise. A1N2D3R4E5W6 (talk) 21:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Account is on a range known almost exclusively for persistent vandalism and block evasion. Interesting that your're so familiar with how "CUs aren't always super clear", given how this is your "first" time here. Yunshui ^雲 _水 23:24, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I feel like even when marked as a CU block, it should still have a reason. I mean otherwise, it isn’t totally clear. Especially without tags. Thank you. Note the IP I mentioned is also blocked for 1 year. A1N2D3R4E5W6 (talk) 21:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yunshui: well then, the range should honeslty be hardblocked. Which would affect me. I admit on that range I have done wrongdoings, but I am here in good faith. A1N2D3R4E5W6 (talk) 23:36, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

==

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A1N2D3R4E5W6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my last unblock request. The reason why I am on that range is a huge proportion of Nassau County relies on the /60. Multiple IP users are vandalizing. There are WP: BLP violations coming from 2600:387:5:807:0:0:0:0:/64, block evasion from 2600:387:5:80D:0:0:0:AA, and more issues with the rangeblock, but it is not me.A1N2D3R4E5W6 (talk) 23:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Another unblock request in a subject line? That's sooooo March 2020. Talk page access revoked. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:14, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

==

I promise this is my last unblock request. I won’t be signing in again if it is denied. I will put the retired template for n my account and change the password to a random string of letters. I know 3 is enough. This is my last shot of getting unblocked on this account, I swear. If ST47 is reading this, tell me exactly what the CU block means. When blocking a /60, there might be collateral damage. The rangeblock is anon-only. If someone really wants, feel free to remove that setting(given the disruption)but blocking these accounts might not be the solution. A1N2D3R4E5W6 (talk) 23:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your UTRS Account[edit]

You have no wikis in which you meet the requirements for UTRS. Your account has been removed and you will be required to reregister once you meet the requirements. If you are blocked on any wiki that UTRS uses, please resolve that before registering agian also. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your UTRS Account[edit]

You have no wikis in which you meet the requirements for UTRS. Your account has been removed and you will be required to reregister once you meet the requirements. If you are blocked on any wiki that UTRS uses, please resolve that before registering agian also. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your UTRS Account[edit]

You have no wikis in which you meet the requirements for UTRS. Your account has been removed and you will be required to reregister once you meet the requirements. If you are blocked on any wiki that UTRS uses, please resolve that before registering agian also. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]