User talk:8472

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
The ability to start new pages.
The ability to rename pages.
The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
The ability to upload images.
The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
The eligibility to become an administrator.
Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~.

Welcome!

Hello, 8472, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Qaz ^(talk) 09:24, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Horten Ho 229[edit]

Removing chunks of material from Wikipedia pages is consdered vandalism. Please refrain from this in the future. Thank you. - Emt147 ^Burninate! 03:18, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WFT? I just cleaned it up a bit, removed a couple of superfluous speeds, I didn't alter a single sentence. So how the hell you come to calling that "removing chunks of material" I don't understand. The current revision is particularly bad, because almost all the speeds are listed in archaic units in the body of the article, while in the table normal units are used. This needs to be addressed, but I'll keep away from the article for now. I might do something to upset you....8472 16:08, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

First of all, lbf, mph, and feet are not "archaic units." Wikipedia is multinational and use of both imperial and metric units is strongly encouraged. Then, you need to proof-read your edits. Here's a sentence you created:

Maximum range was estimated at 1,900 k)

Given removal of many numbers and this clumsy result, I wanted to make sure this wasn't vandalism. No need to get worked up about it. You are more than welcome to improve any article. I recommend looking at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Aircraft/page_content for recommended layout. - Emt147 ^Burninate! 03:45, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK then, no problems there. I disagree with you about the use of imperial units (confuses the hell out of everyone not used to them (that is, most of the world)), but I can live with that. If I indeed made mistakes, I apologise for them, I missed it. 8472 10:27, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

No problem. The general consensus on the units is that "native" units go first. So the Ho 229 article should really have the metric units as the primary with imperials in parentheses (i.e. the reverse of what it is now). Brits went largely metric in the 1950s as I recall, so imperial units go first only for American and pre-1950s British aircraft. - Emt147 ^Burninate! 02:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]