Jump to content

User:Create42000

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CV

eye tracking NOAA talk, whois database, poetry.com, underwriters database, katrinahomes, jambase, chromatic division spreadsheet, [db2]], vt100 dialer, sourceforge communicator, e911, paypal subscribe, archive.org poems, schoolcenter/DCI group, free software movement, open source software, yahoo answers, quintessence algorithm, IEEE 802.11 & 802.16, Electronic Frontier Foundation, IETF, w3c, nist, democrats.org blog, vector graphics, raytracing and AI, mambo/joomla, languages; vb, delphi pascal, perl, python, sql, php/html

end CV


refer to User:Create42000/Sandbox for sandboxy stuff

This user is a member of the

Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD
AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD

Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.