Talk:Trigger Warning (book)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 26 July 2020 by reviewer Spicy (talk · contribs).

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Novels: Short story Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Short story task force.

Untitled[edit]

I tried to add an image of the book cover, but it seems I don't yet have enough permissions as a Wikipedia editor to upload an image to Wikipedia under fair use. Anomaly17 (talk) 21:03, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contents section[edit]

@Harryishere: May I ask why the "Contents" section was removed? It's present in every article about a Neil Gaiman short story collection. I created this article as it seems at least as notable as the others, but did not have its own article, and modeled it after them, for completeness. Anomaly17 (talk) 21:30, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Anomaly17: Hi, sorry for replying late. I thought including the content part would not be a convention to follow. In case you think otherwise, you can undo my changes or insert the content part. Regards. --Harryishere (talk) 15:20, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for this new article. I added a few more reviews from reliable sources. It would be helpful to add a "reception" section discussing how critics reviewed the book..

Spicy (talk) 05:37, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]