Jump to content

Talk:Trailer Park, Inc.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Tp logo.jpg[edit]

Image:Tp logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

conflict of interest?[edit]

I argued (albeit weakly) for keeping this article in the AfD discussion, but I'm a little concerned at how all the substantive edits have been done by accounts who are only editing this page. It leads me to believe that the interest in the article is coming from people within the company, which as far as I know is against wikipedia rules (WP:COI). So... maybe if you're associated in any way with Trailer Park and happen to read this, step back for a couple days and let some other people work on the article? Of course, if you have any good reliable sources I think it would be acceptable to list them on the talk page here to help other editors out. squibix(talk) 02:12, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The sources would be appreciated when editing this page, all the information that we have to work with on this page, is already here. While it would seem lazy to not actively seek out sources, the people that make edits here do so in their spare time. A bit of research here and there won't hurt, but it can't happen for every page. KurthyWurthy (talk) 04:34, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]