A fact from Tatuidris appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 September 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Overseas France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Overseas France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Overseas FranceWikipedia:WikiProject Overseas FranceTemplate:WikiProject Overseas FranceOverseas France articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
This Wikipedia article is based on Donoso, D.A. (2012), "Additions to the taxonomy of the armadillo ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Tatuidris)", Zootaxa, 3503: 61–81 (PDF). Donoso's article, published in Zootaxa by Magnolia Press, is an open access article (see this link) and free to use, "All open access papers are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License." ([1]). Some content in this Wikipedia article (added in this edit) is based on Creative Commons content from AntWeb ("AntWeb content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License." (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License). jonkerz♠talk 15:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Analysis of DNA barcodes indicated a pattern of genetic isolation by distance" For how long?
Upon reading the source, it isn't very clear as to how long, though I may have not read it clearly. Burklemore1 (talk) 17:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"Recently, Keller (2011) challenged the phylogenetic relationships of the poneromorph subfamilies (including Tatuidris)" So what is his scheme?
Removed sentence, it doesn't really belong here. jonkerz ♠talk 00:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
When did it diverge from other ants if it is so ancient?
I've removed "one of the earliest lineages" and "very isolated" claims from the article -- the genus is nested within the poneroids, and Leptanillinae and Martialinae both branched off earlier (it has also had a sister genus since 2014). jonkerz ♠talk 00:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]