Talk:Introduction to entropy

cards on the table

(Discussion deleted and continued on User_talk:PAR)

It seems to me that none of this material by Chjoaygame is relevant for this article, which is an "Introduction to .." article. Some of it may be relevant to Entropy, but I am not even clear about that. This article should be understood by someone who has just been introduced to the topic of entropy. Chjoaygame, please stop wasting our time reading through your long edits to see if anything is relevant to this article. --Bduke (talk) 22:27, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

I am just as guilty for running down this rabbit hole with Chjoaygame. I agree, it has no place on this talk page, and I have removed it to my talk page. Chjoaygame and I have had many arguments in the past, and yes, he tends to say in two complicated paragraphs what he could say in one sentence. In his defense, he will actually engage in an argument, rather than ignoring what you say and repeating the same POV over and over again. He will adjust his understanding as need be and does not engage in ad-hominem attacks. This is rare, and I try to do the same. The discussion actually does derive from a disagreement about the wording of the introduction, and if we reach a consensus of two on my talk page, offer any conclusions here. PAR (talk) 23:45, 20 December 2020 (UTC)