Jump to content

Talk:Hank Patterson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hank Patterson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not Hank[edit]

A reader contacted Wikimedia ticket:2019080310000382 suggesting that the leftmost character in the main image is not Hank Patterson but Eddie Waller. I think they are right but I'd like someone else to double check before making the change.

I left a comment on the image talk page but I'm not sure how soon someone will respond there.S Philbrick(Talk) 02:12, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it is Patterson, a still found [1] from the same film shows a different bone structure in the face, one much more like he had in the 1960s. Going to remove the image, if anyone has any better evidence to the contrary they are free to restore it. Danthemankhan 00:03, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]