Talk:2024 Indian general election in Andhra Pradesh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Semi-protected edit request on 19 March 2024[edit]

Update on News 18 Opinion Poll and India TV-CNX Opinion Poll which was published on 18 March 2024. Klpskn (talk) 16:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 16:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UPE warning[edit]

Just came across this on Twitter. To all those watching this page, keep an eye on new wikilinks being added to non-notable TDP candidate names, in case UPEs start creating pages for them. Consensus says that candidates for election do not, per se, meet notability unless they actually win. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/my edits) 14:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Un-notable parties[edit]

Hi @Maphumor, you have been adding non notable parties on the article in the parties and alliance section even after multiple reverts and not acknowledging the notice on your talk page. Refrain from adding non notable parties as stated by the Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian politics/Election: Article structure#Parties and alliances. 456legendtalk 13:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Maphumor do you care to reply here? This is your nth number of time placing the content again even after a notice on your talk page and the article talk page here. 456legendtalk 21:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Maphumor, you have crossed your limit of 3 reverts I suppose and I am not going to revert this again. Your inability to respond to the notice on your talk page and here on this talk page is not welcoming for a good consensus on Wikipedia. Instead now, I will be reporting this to the Wikipedia administrator incidents board. Thank you 456legendtalk 17:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Dhruv edits, I don't think adding un-notable parties in a large scale to the parties and alliances section is justified. Additionally, the content is not reliable and lack of sources to support the notability of the parties is just making the article a mess with blank columns. Please consider reverting based on the guidelines of the relevant WP.456legendtalk 23:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]