Talk:2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I will take a look at this, make straightforward copyedits as I go (please revert if I accidentally change the meaning!) and jot questions below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~I'd tack the lone sentence at the bottom of the lead onto the end of the first para. Isolated sentences look choppy.~~

..~~.reinforced Chelsea's position in first - sounds like a gear...I'd go with "reinforced Chelsea's position at the top of the table"~~

~~Background~~ ~~section has no inline cites~~

~~I've put some ^{[citation needed]} tags further down too.~~

Otherwise looks ok. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for taking a look at this. Have made corrections. Lemonade51 (talk) 20:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Earwig's copyvio checker passed ok.

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

- all good Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]