Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RfPP)
"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Shortcuts

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Talk:Colour trade mark

    Reason: Long term disruption/spam/nonsense edits. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    If we protect the page you won't be allowed to edit it either. Are you OK with that? Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Elephant

    Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. If you look at the revision history, there appears to be disruption. Extend the protection level to Extended-Confirmed 70.50.199.125 (talk) 03:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing anything anywhere near the sort of disruption that would require EC, much less the existing level of protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Sarah Fuller (athlete)

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just those two edits and then they stopped. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Ayatollah

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandalism by multiple IP. —Loginnigol 06:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Karma's World

    Reason: Two months of IP users adding fake info about a fifth season. No sources to back it up. Primary source, Netflix, has also made no mention of it. X201 (talk) 07:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Mohammad Mokhber

    Reason: Heavily edited, due to assuming the acting president of Iran position when Ebrahim Raisi died. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 07:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    2023–24 Burnley F.C. season

    Reason: IP vandalism; multiple different IP Addresses are used to vandalize the page Eem dik doun in toene (talk) 08:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Kavala International Airport

    Temporary semi-protection: IP-hopper keeps adding unsourced information despite requests in the article to provide sources. The Banner talk 09:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    The range has now moved into vandalism. The Banner talk 10:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    The Tortured Poets Department

    Reason: recurring IP disruptive edits in the past week. Ippantekina (talk) 09:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Evangelos Marinakis

    Reason: Since my last request for protection there has been a significant amount of IP vandalism, some of which violate BLP policies Connorcp (talk) 10:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:2024 Indian Premier League Teams

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are targeting this Template also; as the Playoffs are scheduled to take place this week. See revision history Also, this template is transcluded into a semi-proteceted page. It should be protected as well. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 11:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Mir Hamza

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been repeatedly vandalized by 119.155.*.* for almost a week now; warning them is pointless because they keep changing their address. —Bruce1eetalk 11:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    2024–25 Premier League

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and addition of unsourced material, following press speculation, at end of season. Egghead06 (talk) 11:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Shortcuts

    january 20

    The article is simultaneously semi-protected as well as pending protected, both with indefinite deadlines. I thought there should be only one type of edit-protection, if not one indefinite and the other time-based like the page kate Ryan.102.159.242.79 (talk) 20:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Regarding Kate Ryan, I have removed the semi-protection as that was what was intended.
      @Deb: Would you be open to removing the semi-protection here and seeing how it fares under pending-changes? It has been five-and-a-half years since your protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Ebrahim Raisi

    Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the person is dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.58.90.249 (talk) 06:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Comment:: That's not really a reason, especially given the circumstances. Also, I assume you mean Ebrahim Raisi, not an article that doesn't exist. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Ebrahim Raisi is not protected. Favonian (talk) 09:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Edinburgh_Rape_Crisis_Centre

    Reason: There has been a significant legal judgement in Scotland regarding the ERCC which has important knock on effects for politics in Scotland and the UK. This page being protected and isolated has meant other Wikipedia's are unable to update the page and add the judgement to Wikipedia. 82.10.58.36 (talk) 10:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 11:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
    Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


    Israel–Hamas war

    Change "Since the start of the Israeli operation, more than 35,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed,[86] including over 15,000 children and 10,000 women.[87][88]" to "Since the start of the Israeli operation, nearly 35,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed,[86] including over 7,000 children and nearly 5,000 women.[87][88]." This is based on the data recently revised by the UN, accessible here: https://www.ochaopt.org/content/hostilities-gaza-strip-and-israel-reported-impact-day-215. ConDissenter (talk) 21:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Is there another place to request this change? The talk page for Israel-Hamas war is restricted as well. The current source for casualty data is palinfo.com, which describes itself by saying it "does not lay any claim to neutrality for it blatantly sides with the oppressed Palestinian people." https://english.palinfo.com/about-us/. Recognizing that reliable sources do not need to have a neutral POV, why should we use this as a source rather than a less biased source like the United Nations? ConDissenter (talk) 18:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @ConDissenter Please go check Talk:Israel–Hamas war for earlier discussions and to see why your request is unlikely to succeed. FYI, the lower numbers refer not to the killed overall but to the killed who have additionally been identified by name. Besides, all the numbers are sourced to Gaza MoH anyway. — kashmīrī TALK 09:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the reply, Kashmiri. I recognize the data is all coming from the same place. (I've tried to access but can't find a reliable site for the Gaza Health Ministry to find the data directly, so I assume the UN is accurately presenting the data.) I agree it hasn't changed the total number killed which is why I didn't suggest a change to that -- beyond fixing the "more than" to "nearly" 35,000. But I don't see any basis for keeping outdated numbers on women and children. The old ratio was 72% and the new ratio was 52%. The talk page suggests we need to wait for more RS, but at this point there are plenty:
    https://www.npr.org/2024/05/15/1251265727/un-gaza-death-toll-women-children
    https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/13/middleeast/death-toll-gaza-fatalities-un-intl-latam/index.html
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/gaza-women-children-death-toll-1.7203167
    Is there any way to flag this for the editors of that page, even on the Talk page? ConDissenter (talk) 23:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=1224733527"