User talk:M S Hassan

May 2024[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Rudra: Boom Chik Chik Boom. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

M S Hassan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I blocked? I never intended to do edit war, I agree that I reverted the other user's edit multiple times but I never intended to do edit war, I warned them on their talk page multiple times, started a discussion on article's talk page but they kept reverting.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating WP:EW. What you describe is you violating WP:EW. Yamla (talk) 19:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

M S Hassan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I agree that I edit warred and I shouldn't have but I never intended to do so, I'll make sure that this won't happen again.

Decline reason:

Please tell exactly how you will do that. 331dot (talk) 07:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

M S Hassan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I agree that I edit warred and I shouldn't have but I never intended to do so, I'll make sure that this won't happen again, I'll start a discussion and reach consequences to avoid edit warring, in fact I started a discussion this time but I should have started earlier.

Decline reason:

I assume you mean "consensus" rather than "consequences". As Bbb23 observed below, your example is not a discussion that's attempting to reach consensus – it's a threat. Perhaps there's a language issue here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:46, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That's not a "discussion"; it's a threat.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a threat, it's a warning, I warned them multiple times on their talk page but they didn't respond so I thought It'd be better if I mention a warning on discussion as well. M S Hassan ^{(talk | contributions)} 14:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

M S Hassan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know that my tone sounds like I was threatening but believe me I was just giving a warning, from the next time I won't words which are threatening in any discussion.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I know that my tone sounds like I was threatening but believe me I was just giving a warning, from the next time I won't words which are threatening in any discussion. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I know that my tone sounds like I was threatening but believe me I was just giving a warning, from the next time I won't words which are threatening in any discussion. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I know that my tone sounds like I was threatening but believe me I was just giving a warning, from the next time I won't words which are threatening in any discussion. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}